<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Business, Decision Making and the Future of Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debaillon.com/2010/05/social-business-decision-making-and-the-future-of-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debaillon.com/2010/05/social-business-decision-making-and-the-future-of-management/</link>
	<description>Thierry de Baillon &#039;s bilingual thoughts about the crossing between social media, collaborative organizations and human behaviors in the workplace.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thierry de Baillon</title>
		<link>http://www.debaillon.com/2010/05/social-business-decision-making-and-the-future-of-management/comment-page-1/#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>Thierry de Baillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 07:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debaillon.com/?p=631#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for these thoughts, Mark. The future of business... Well, I think there definitely will be two different kinds of organizations. But this is worth more than a comment. Stay tuned : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for these thoughts, Mark. The future of business&#8230; Well, I think there definitely will be two different kinds of organizations. But this is worth more than a comment. Stay tuned : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Husband</title>
		<link>http://www.debaillon.com/2010/05/social-business-decision-making-and-the-future-of-management/comment-page-1/#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Husband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 15:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debaillon.com/?p=631#comment-1498</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;To reach the next step, companies dipping their toes into Social Business will need people who combine HR skills with high analysis-synthesis competencies. Empowerers?&lt;/I&gt;

I don&#039;t think &quot;dipping their toes&quot; is going to be very satisfying (the water in the pool ALWAYS feels too cold at first), but empowerment and inclusiveness ?  Yes, fundamentally necessary and an issue that cannot be avoided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To reach the next step, companies dipping their toes into Social Business will need people who combine HR skills with high analysis-synthesis competencies. Empowerers?</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think &#8220;dipping their toes&#8221; is going to be very satisfying (the water in the pool ALWAYS feels too cold at first), but empowerment and inclusiveness ?  Yes, fundamentally necessary and an issue that cannot be avoided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Tamis</title>
		<link>http://www.debaillon.com/2010/05/social-business-decision-making-and-the-future-of-management/comment-page-1/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Tamis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debaillon.com/?p=631#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>Hi Thierry,

As always, good insights :) Just to play the Devil&#039;s Advocate, should we consider the Enterprise as the optimal way of organising for today&#039;s business environment? 

Before we needed companies to create and maintain the links between resources, at the cost of heavy investment (real-estate, salaries, technological means, IP etc). Companies were (and in most cases still are) very protective in order to ensure that the investments made could be capitalised upon without being cannibalised by the competition. 

With all these new means at our disposal and the ability to find and share with others beyond the boundaries of the enterprise, it may be interesting to look into other ways of organising to reach the same objectives of meeting desired outcomes for customers. The 20th Century organisation could actually be a barrier to innovation because it prohibits bringing together and collaborating with best-of-class resources wherever they are or whoever they may be on as-needed basis. So rather than try to fix organisations that do not have the culture (or do not want to change this), we could be looking at how to use Enterprise 2.0 methodology to create a new dynamic - have the organisation concentrate on its core-of-core competency and expand its periphery by collaborating with best-of-class resources, be they other core-focused companies or networks of individuals. 

It would be a radical change in mindset, but could be interesting for innovative solutions for getting the customer job done :)

Cheers,

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thierry,</p>
<p>As always, good insights <img src='http://www.debaillon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Just to play the Devil&#8217;s Advocate, should we consider the Enterprise as the optimal way of organising for today&#8217;s business environment? </p>
<p>Before we needed companies to create and maintain the links between resources, at the cost of heavy investment (real-estate, salaries, technological means, IP etc). Companies were (and in most cases still are) very protective in order to ensure that the investments made could be capitalised upon without being cannibalised by the competition. </p>
<p>With all these new means at our disposal and the ability to find and share with others beyond the boundaries of the enterprise, it may be interesting to look into other ways of organising to reach the same objectives of meeting desired outcomes for customers. The 20th Century organisation could actually be a barrier to innovation because it prohibits bringing together and collaborating with best-of-class resources wherever they are or whoever they may be on as-needed basis. So rather than try to fix organisations that do not have the culture (or do not want to change this), we could be looking at how to use Enterprise 2.0 methodology to create a new dynamic &#8211; have the organisation concentrate on its core-of-core competency and expand its periphery by collaborating with best-of-class resources, be they other core-focused companies or networks of individuals. </p>
<p>It would be a radical change in mindset, but could be interesting for innovative solutions for getting the customer job done <img src='http://www.debaillon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Business, Decision Making and the Future of Management &#124; Sonnez en cas d&#8217;absence &#171; My Thoughts Enclosed&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.debaillon.com/2010/05/social-business-decision-making-and-the-future-of-management/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Business, Decision Making and the Future of Management &#124; Sonnez en cas d&#8217;absence &#171; My Thoughts Enclosed&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 09:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debaillon.com/?p=631#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Business, Decision Making and the Future of Management &#124; Sonnez en cas&#160;d&#8217;absence  Jump to Comments    Empowering both customers and knowledge workers by providing all information needed for correct analysis, facilitating individual decision making according to one’s competencies and learning abilities, providing guidance across internal and hybrid clusters and communities, fostering autonomy, those are the new skills needed inside organizations to unleash the power of networked environments. via debaillon.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Business, Decision Making and the Future of Management | Sonnez en cas&nbsp;d&#8217;absence  Jump to Comments    Empowering both customers and knowledge workers by providing all information needed for correct analysis, facilitating individual decision making according to one’s competencies and learning abilities, providing guidance across internal and hybrid clusters and communities, fostering autonomy, those are the new skills needed inside organizations to unleash the power of networked environments. via debaillon.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Social Business, Decision Making and the Future of Management &#124; Sonnez en cas d'absence -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.debaillon.com/2010/05/social-business-decision-making-and-the-future-of-management/comment-page-1/#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Social Business, Decision Making and the Future of Management &#124; Sonnez en cas d'absence -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 12:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debaillon.com/?p=631#comment-1488</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Avi Joseph, Bill Ives, Syamant, Thierry de Baillon, Thierry de Baillon and others. Thierry de Baillon said: [blog post] Social Business, Decision Making and the Future of Management http://bit.ly/98eD2x [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Avi Joseph, Bill Ives, Syamant, Thierry de Baillon, Thierry de Baillon and others. Thierry de Baillon said: [blog post] Social Business, Decision Making and the Future of Management <a href="http://bit.ly/98eD2x">http://bit.ly/98eD2x</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

