The tainted narrative of the workplace

Read this post in: French

workplace-narrativeTechnology is influencing more than the way we work, it also deeply changes the notion of workplace. As IBM wrote in 2011 in its The new workplace: are you ready? white paper:

“Today’s workplace is a virtual and/or physical environment, characterized by connections, collaboration and user choice, that enables the worker to be more agile and perform activities anywhere, anytime -ultimately creating greater enterprise value”.

Collaboration, as mediated by social software, is on the agenda of every CEO, or should at least be. A widening array of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools, available on almost any device you might think of, allows workers to access resources and knowledge wherever they are, eliminating the necessity to maintain a unified physical workspace. Technology itself is becoming nomad, ubiquitous, pervasive and affordable, in other words consumerized. Even further, the fast growing trend toward BYOD implies a deep interweaving of technology with most of our most mundane social behaviors. Yet, business as usual is still the rule, and most companies seem to be impervious to the changes which are transforming our everyday life.

Walking the talk… Yes, but which talk?

Today’s process based, widely automated and overly bureaucratic organizations are the result of an evolution which began during nineteenth century’s industrial revolution. But this didn’t come by itself. They were shaped that way by enactment, through the discourse and actions of generations of C-level executives, through the theories and principles taught for decades in business schools, with the help of major consulting firms, deeply engraining the Taylorist idea of the firm as a machine, in which people are less considered as resources than as an adjustment variable of costs. How work is really done, the realm of grey processes and human ad hoc collaboration, has progressively been buried under a conceptual view of how work should be done.

What we are in fact witnessing today is the progressive substitution of this narrative by another, heralding a social enterprise enabled by technology. But has the notion of a diffuse workplace a firmer grasp on reality? In an article provocatively entitled ‘I could be dead for two weeks and my boss would never know’: The rhetoric and reality of flexible work, Dr. Andrea Whittle has shown how teleworking can be different from the discourse held by technology vendors. Isolation, difficulties to balance private and professional life, lack of true collaboration, are realities experienced by most workers. But, just like the reality of work in the “traditional” corporate world, the reality behind the distributed workspace is hidden, deleted from the dominant discourse. Today’s technology vendors have replaced yesterday’s strategy consultancies in building the narrative of the workplace.

From connections to nodes

Virtual team collaboration is a central element of this new discourse. Socialcast, for example, promises “A better way to collaborate” as follows:

“Improve teamwork through the power of enterprise social networking. You can also safely include trusted partners, customers and vendors. With Socialcast share information, assign tasks, and collaborate on documents, keeping all members of the team in synch.”

Similarly, for Jive:

“Business depends on teamwork. But traditional tools hamper as much as help, resulting in wasted time, duplicated efforts and missed opportunities. Hours get swallowed up by email and unproductive meetings. Great ideas are lost in inboxes and siloed enterprise software. Essential information is drowned out by noise. It doesn’t have to be that way.”

The focus on teamwork isn’t a new one. It is, in fact, the workplace implementation of the theories of Elton Mayo, an industrial sociologist, formulated in 1933, according to which group belonging increases a worker’s performance, and it is quite paradoxical to see that one of the key arguments of social technology vendors is a concept which gained acceptance and importance in the Taylorist model of organizations.

True collaborative networks do not rely so much on teams than on individuals, as B. Nardi, S. Whittaker and H. Schwartz have shown. The main benefits for networked organizations do not lie in the outcome from teams, but in individual knowledge acquisition, in the ability to connect with the right people and to access the right information at the right time. Instead of focusing on teams and communities, we must concentrate our efforts in providing workers with the right resources and knowledge to build their own connections. The basic unit of social business technbology is personal knowledge management, not collaborative workspaces.

A recent study has demonstrated that “the more teleworkers communicate with their colleagues and manager using email, instant messenger, videoconferencing, and face-to-face communication, the more they feel stressed due to interruptions”. In the virtual workspace, the high level of interactive communication associated with teamwork reveals itself counterproductive and source of stress. Furthermore, the common obsession with maintaining connections through communication leads to less attachment to their organization. Networks are made of connections, of course, but they are ultimately made of nodes, and these nodes are people. As the last IBM’s Global CEO Study, Leading through connections, puts it:

“By empowering employees to act on their own ideas, CEOs are building employee accountability, initiative and loyalty. And by equipping employees to work in an open environment, they are arming the people who represent their brands to the world.”

But instead of supporting individual workers, organizations, as Nardi, Whittaker and Schwartz have shown, are in fact putting responsibility of the extra work required for virtual workplaces to work seamlessly on them, and hide the reality of this work in the emergent narrative of the workplace. Shifting from bureaucracy to networkracy will require each worker to be allowed to tell his own story of how business is done. Rather than emphasizing on the cultural change needed for organizations to become social businesses, we should focus on unleashing and supporting in the workplace the change which is already happening there as well as in our personal lives, and on redesigning organizations around it.

This post first appeared on collaborativeinnovation.org

This entry was posted in As experimented, As seen, heard or read, English and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
Loading Facebook Comments ...

5 Responses to The tainted narrative of the workplace

  1. Pingback: PKM: the basic unit of social business | Harold Jarche

  2. Ana Silva says:

    You’ve raised a very interesting point with this post Thierry. On reading it I was wondering if this is a “one way or the other” type of situation because I actually see value in both: the personal knowledge management, the individual as a node in the network AND the communities/teams, as I think you do also. As you said, technology vendors (and not only them) focus too much on groups, communities, collaboration. It is not that those concepts are not valuable, it is, in my opinion, that we do not understand them. We tend to think that everything needs to be collaborative when that is not the case (reminds me of Morten Hansen’s great book on collaboration). When working in a team we usually dread discussions or conflict, we believe that everything needs to be done in consensus and so decisions and actions take too much time. Add in the extra factor of virtual collaboration or collaboration across different cultures and time zones and you have a recipe for potential failure or dragging of projects. In short, I believe many of us need to learn how to work together when needed, while developing our personal knowledge and network (a bit of the “what’s in it for me” rational if you want).

  3. Pingback: Why do I need KM? | Harold Jarche

  4. One of the main misconceptions about glass is that it is
    rather dull with practically no privacy. With all the new advances in technology- that is
    simply just not the case anymore.

    Over the years, glass manufacturers have come up with various types of glass like double glazed windows and patterned glass.

    You can use glass doors for your bathroom, patio and other
    places at your house to give your home an ultramodern or elegant look and feel.

    So you do not have to worry about the glass being dull or plain. Purchasing glass that
    has etched designs of nature like flowers and trees or any other categories based on your personal taste is possible
    nowadays. So finding the right kind of glass to blend with other
    furnishings in a particular room is indeed possible.
    There is no shortage of choices in terms of glass
    design. 

    Another benefit of glass is in terms of insulation. Glass is
    not a good conductor of heat. During our hot summer season, with all the advances in energy efficiency with glass, glass will not absorb
    heat, making the room hotter. During a winter or autumn period,
    glass will not cause much heat loss. 

    So you and your family might enjoy a more cooling effect during summer and
    a warmer effect during winter or autumn. You also save money in terms
    of utility bills. Since there is less heat loss, you can turn down the heating system to
    a lower temperature, which results in less energy consumption. During
    summer, there would not be any necessity to lower the temperature. 

    Another benefit of using glass doors and windows is that
    it just makes your home brighter and more cheerful feeling.
    With our famous sunny days, there might be no necessity to switch on lights
    to light up a particular place since there is sufficient natural light.

  5. LinkedIn has a great feature that connects with your existing email
    accounts and allows you to invite anyone you have interacted with
    to your network. This means that you might reach people you interacted with once or twice, or
    people that you haven’t spoken with in a while.
    This is a powerful tool, but are you using it effectively in your marketing?

    LinkedIn as a Data Collector
    Look at all the ways you can collect data from people.
    The easiest metric to track for most is their email addresses, so ask people and promote their use.
    Create mailers or offer contests via email registration. Remember,
    each email you collect is another potential LinkedIn profile
    waiting to be connected to. Also, you might convince someone to join LinkedIn when they receive an invite
    from you, which means more customers to interact with.

    Easy Ways to Connect on LinkedIn
    So, what are some easy ways to connect with users and
    get them to want to network with you? Many companies have started suing LinkedIn as a corporate blog to promote brand awareness.
    These blogs might not even have anything to do with the products being sold, but they might tie in with corporate culture or offer up some helpful knowledge or technique.
    This is called generating substance, and if you want people to see a value in your postings, you need to
    provide that substance, otherwise they simply won’t care.

    The nice thing about this is you don’t have to
    be a multi-faceted business guru to provide content. Maybe you
    promote an interesting link of the day, or maybe you repost
    a news story about something company-related (please
    give credit if you do this.). It could even be a humorous blurb
    or story, or even a business-appropriate joke
    to keep your network’s attention. The only constant is that the postings stay constant.
    If you start it, then maintain it to help build
    that brand awareness. Remember, people won’t actively look for you if
    they don’t know you exist.
    One great way that some companies have started building a loyalty
    network is through promoting their employees. Some companies will offer a spotlight on their employees, showing off the projects
    they have done or discussing their high points. This not only helps to ensure
    your employees feel valued, but it also helps
    to paint your company as more human, which is something you want when trying to get people to connect
    with you.
    Pitfalls and Things to Avoid With LinkedIn
     
    Most of what has been discussed here has been the positives of using LinkedIn for your promotions, but there are some
    pitfalls you may want to avoid. Again, not all marketing works for
    all niches and some can be turned off more easily than others.

    For starters, when advertising with a graphic, consider the context that
    your audience will view it in. LinkedIn is business to business networking.
    Is your picture one that would be considered safe for a
    business networking platform? Yes, attractive, nearly-naked people
    tend to get clicks, but are those the kind of ads people at major corporations are going to
    be more than likely be turned off due to lack of professionalism?
    Consider your content in your pictures before posting and make sure your graphics are
    a good match to your audience and marketing message.

    Second, watch your language. While on the surface, this
    could be taken as do not swear, on a deeper level,
    you have to consider what a company will filter for and what
    they will allow. Some words tend to trigger web filters pretty easily, so be
    careful about your verbiage. Also, look at the message your words send.
    Are you trying to be edgy, dynamic, endearing? Do your
    words properly convey the message you want people to see?
    Sometimes people get so wrapped up in sending out a strong message that they fail to consider if it is the
    right one.
    Third, don’t verbally tie yourself to a region or company if you
    can help it. While you may want to highlight a company on a landing page
    or maybe you are geared towards a certain region of the world,
    you don’t want to inadvertently exclude potential customers because they think your ads don’t immediately apply to them.
    Remember, you can focus your ads in terms of companies and
    locations ahead of time, so listing out that info in the actual ad
    might prove redundant.
    Fourth, don’t slack on your content. It can be easy to start
    with a big push, but the number one thing that kills an audience’s interest is inconsistency.
    Don’t slouch on your posts. Make sure you dedicate a certain period of time each day to providing some form of content.
    If you can’t or think you might have problems with this, hire someone to do it for you or spend
    a day or two generating multiple posts so that
    you can just plug and play. However you do it, just be sure to keep doing
    it. You are setting an expectation of service as accompany when you post, and to do so inconsistently will send a bad message
    abour what your company considers professional.
    Fifth, be careful on rebranding. Some smaller companies take the philosophy of experimentation a bit too far and keep trying to reinvent themselves every month or
    quarter, but the truth of it is that many companies form bonds
    over the long term with clients, and just because you
    announce a name change or a new logo, that doesn’t mean that your
    clientele is paying attention. To build your brand, you need consistency, so stick
    to a logo or name and try to avoid being so edgy that you can’t
    make up your mind about your name. Remember, you’re a
    business, not a rock star.
    LinkedIn Final Thoughts
     
    LinkedIn is a wonderful tool for reaching people in the business world.

    Stop by my page Training For Network Marketing

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>